How to use the averaging down trading strategy

Although the words ‘average’ and ‘down’ can sound discouraging, an averaging down strategy involves buying more of an asset you already hold when its price falls. This approach may help reduce the average price paid per unit, potentially improving the break-even point if the price recovers. However, if the price continues to fall, losses can increase.

The strategy can be influenced by behavioural biases such as anchoring and loss aversion, rather than eliminating them.

What does averaging down mean?

Let’s say you buy shares in XYZ, a popular blue-chip utility company, at $20 each, purchasing 10 shares for $200. The government then announces new price caps on energy, which may affect company profits. The share price drops to $18, but the long-term outlook appears sound, so you buy another 10 shares, investing $180 more. Later, the price falls again to $16, and you buy 10 additional shares for $160. Your total investment is now $540 for 30 shares, bringing your average purchase price to $18 per share.

This example illustrates how averaging down can reduce the average entry price, meaning the stock needs to rise only above $18 to generate a profit. However, if the price continues to decline, losses can compound. For instance, if the stock falls to $10 and you sell, your loss would be $240 on 30 shares, compared with $100 if you hadn’t averaged down.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Buy and sell points

Anchoring and loss aversion can heavily influence when traders buy or sell. The initial purchase price often becomes the anchor point, shaping how gains and losses are viewed. This focus can distort decisions if it prevents traders from considering broader economic or market conditions.

If a trader fixates on this anchor point without assessing the current outlook, it becomes a bias rather than a rational benchmark.

Anchoring bias and loss aversion bias

Anchoring bias is common among traders exploring unfamiliar markets or instruments. They tend to evaluate all future price movements against their original entry price, which can limit objectivity.

Loss aversion describes the tendency to avoid realising a loss, even when doing so might be more rational. In an averaging down scenario, this bias can lead to continuing to buy into a declining market in the hope of recovery, rather than re-evaluating the position.

Traders may find it useful to set predefined loss limits or consider whether exiting and reassessing could be more effective than averaging down purely to recoup earlier losses.

Focusing on different prices

In the earlier example, a trader anchored at the original $20 price might refuse to sell below that point, missing opportunities for smaller profits. Alternatively, anchoring to the last purchase at $16 could lead to selling too early – for example, at $16.10 – locking in minor gains on recent purchases but losses overall.

Avoiding these biases allows traders to focus on the average entry price and make decisions based on objective analysis rather than emotion.

Give up that gut ‘anchor’ feeling

Averaging down means adding to a losing position, but it can also lower the point at which a rebound becomes profitable. It might suit longer-term investors with confidence in an asset’s fundamentals, but short-term traders may need tighter risk limits and greater discipline.

Disciplined trading focuses on protecting capital and managing risk, rather than relying on instinct. Averaging down is not always appropriate, especially if it distracts from other opportunities such as momentum or trend-following trades.

Many traders prioritise consistency and sound risk management over recovering losses. Averaging down may suit certain strategies or market conditions, but doing so for the wrong reasons can be counterproductive.

Loss aversion bias

Loss aversion can make averaging down particularly risky. It reflects a reluctance to sell losing positions, even when fundamentals suggest they may not recover. If a trader continues buying falling assets out of hope rather than analysis, the strategy can become self-defeating – effectively throwing good money after bad.

Does the averaging down strategy work?

Buying assets at lower prices can sometimes be effective, particularly when the underlying fundamentals remain sound. However, averaging down is not the same as value investing. The latter involves identifying undervalued opportunities based on financial analysis, while averaging down is often a reactive approach to falling prices.

It may be more viable when a company’s long-term outlook remains stable, but it carries the inherent risk that the price will not recover.

Going the other way: averaging up

Averaging up takes the opposite approach – adding to a position as the price rises. It often involves smaller, incremental purchases and is associated with trend-following strategies. Some traders view it as less risky, as it builds exposure in line with positive market momentum, though its success can still vary across markets and timeframes.

Key takeaways

• When assessing whether averaging down fits your strategy:
• Set clear risk parameters and use stop-loss orders to limit downside.
• Diversify to spread risk across sectors or instruments.
• Focus on assets with sound fundamentals, not just price movements.
• Stay aware of behavioural biases, such as anchoring and loss aversion.

Understand that strategies linked to the Martingale approach, which involve increasing position sizes after losses, can raise exposure quickly and lead to significant drawdowns.

Create an account Open a demo account

FAQ