Geopolitics and trade headwinds reignite market volatility

Risk-off sentiment returns to markets as tensions in the Middle East escalate, equities drop, oil surges, and gold attracts safe haven flows
By Daniela Hathorn and Kyle Rodda

Geopolitical Shock: Escalation in the Middle East

Markets were caught off guard late last week by a sudden flare-up in Middle Eastern tensions. Although investors were becoming increasingly cautious following reports of the U.S. removing key diplomatic personnel from embassies in Iraq, and prior warnings from Israel regarding potential strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, the reality of military action sent shockwaves through global markets.

The threat of Israeli military action has loomed for years, but this time, it materialized with significant implications. The challenge now is how markets will price the risks associated with an unpredictable and potentially escalating conflict. Unlike traditional economic policies or fiscal changes, the ramifications of war are complex and difficult to quantify. Investors are left with little choice but to react swiftly—often selling first and reassessing later.

Market Reactions

One of the most difficult tasks for market participants is evaluating the impact of war risks. Whereas economic metrics allow for at least some predictive modelling, geopolitical instability—especially when involving major powers such as the U.S. and Iran—introduces a layer of uncertainty that resists quantification.

This latest conflict has direct implications for energy markets. The strikes targeted Iranian nuclear infrastructure, allegedly in response to Iran nearing the capability to produce a nuclear weapon. In retaliation, Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz—a key global shipping route. Meanwhile, Israeli forces have reportedly targeted Iranian gas and oil refineries, raising concerns over a major supply disruption.

Although Iranian oil has technically been sanctioned for years, a substantial volume has continued to reach global markets through circumventive channels. Therefore, any credible threat to halt this flow could have profound effects—both as a supply shock and a trigger for inflationary pressures worldwide.

Energy and Equity Markets: Volatility on the Rise

As the week began, energy markets reflected heightened tensions. Oil prices, which surged on Friday, saw a modest pullback as trading resumed. Natural gas followed a similar pattern—spiking early before dipping slightly. These movements suggest that investors are closely monitoring developments, bracing for potential volatility.

US Crude (WTI) daily chart

(Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results)

Equity markets also suffered. The downturn began last week and continued into Monday. European indices like the DAX have started the week attempting to recover some momentum. However, investors are likely to remain on a risk-off mode, reassessing positions amidst geopolitical tension and uncertainty.

U.S.–China Talks Stagnate

Compounding the volatility are continued trade tensions between the U.S. and China. Hopes for meaningful progress from recent talks in London were largely unmet. Despite initial optimism, the discussions yielded little beyond reaffirmations of mutual cooperation and the need to address long-standing concerns, including intellectual property rights and national security.

Both nations remain firm in their intention to protect their competitive advantages. A firm resolution or rollback of export restrictions appears unlikely in the near term. Markets, possibly expecting incremental progress, were disappointed. The stalemate reinforces the notion that this issue will drag on, with the potential for further strain on global trade flows.

A particularly striking comment from Chinese officials—that they do not wish to escalate but are prepared to respond if provoked—highlighted the fragile state of relations. This added to investors' unease, emphasizing the long and uncertain road ahead in trade negotiations.

Softer U.S. Inflation Offers Some Relief

In contrast to geopolitical and trade-related headwinds, U.S. inflation data provided a small measure of relief. Both headline and core CPI came in below expectations last week, driven in part by falling energy prices. This raised hopes that the Federal Reserve may eventually ease monetary policy, though a rate cut does not appear imminent.

The softer inflation figures helped U.S. equity markets show some relative resilience compared to Europe and Asia. However, overall sentiment remains cautious, with macroeconomic uncertainty and geopolitical risk keeping investors on edge.

Outlook

In summary, this week begins with a volatile mix of geopolitical tension, stagnating trade talks, and cautious optimism stemming from inflation data. The energy market is especially vulnerable, and global equities are poised for further instability.

Markets may find some footing if diplomatic channels prevail, but the risk of further escalation in the Middle East—and prolonged uncertainty in U.S.–China relations—will likely keep investors jittery for the foreseeable future.

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.