Pulse: Q4 2022 retail investor trading trends

Analysis of Q4, 2022 trading data from Capital.com.
By Capital.com
pulse-q4

In a year of turmoil, retail investors have once again shown they are prepared to adapt their trading strategies in the light of disruptive market events – whether that is in response to the impact of central bank interest-rate meetings on trading the GBP/USD currency pair, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on oil and natural gas prices, or the fallout sparked by the collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried’s cryptocurrency exchange FTX.

Throughout all of this, digital platforms such as Capital.com, have played an important role in helping level up the access to the financial markets so that people can act on their own insights and analysis, and trade more easily.

What have retail investors chosen to do with their capital in the fourth quarter of 2022? An answer to that can be found in the exclusive data contained in Capital.com’s sector-leading trading platform – which has been ranked among the top five brokers in the UK and globally, by online broker comparison site BrokerChooser. Analysts, financial professionals and journalists can once again obtain a valuable glimpse into the trends exhibited by our global community of retail investors, thanks to our latest Capital Pulse quarterly report.

The main themes that have emerged from the data during the fourth quarter have been the increased adoption of short trading positions among our traders (up from 26% in 2021 to 37% in 2022) and the continued resurgence of stop-loss orders, which reached a new platform record of 12.9% of Q4 transactions.

In addition, our traders also demonstrated their resilience when it came to modifying positions during moments of elevated volatility, as was seen during GBP/USD trades in response to the tax-cutting mini-budget proposed by the former UK chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng.

For more information about Capital.com and our global community of traders, visit our website’s Media Centre.

Peter Hetherington
CEO, Capital.com

Across the markets

The Capital.com platform provides traders with access to more than 3,700 different instruments across numerous markets: shares, exchange-traded funds, currencies, commodities and indices.

As of the fourth quarter, the Capital.com group reported trading volumes in excess of $1trn for 2022. We have group entities located in the UK, Cyprus and Australia that are respectively authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

Highlights from this report

Selected key insights drawn from the trading data in Q4 2022:

  • In the light of bearish market moves in the fourth quarter of 2022, trader behaviour evolved to include an increased adoption of short trading positions. The index market witnessed the greatest rise in short trades (43%).
  • As asset volatility became an increasing feature of the markets in Q4, our traders’ use of stop-loss orders increased to around 12% of the platform’s trades.
  • US tech stocks (US100) – along with oil, natural gas and gold – topped the list of most-traded assets on the Capital.com platform.
  • Our clients actively traded risk events to take advantage of volatile market conditions, as evidenced by spikes in the total number of GBP/USD trades following US Federal Reserve and Bank of England meetings.
  • Capital.com traders demonstrated their engagement with major risk events when they tripled the number of GBP/USD trades, reduced their net-long holdings in the pound for net-short positions, and increased the number of stop-loss orders on cable trades following the UK’s disastrous mini-budget that pushed sterling to a record low.
  • When it came to trades relating to the wider US stock market (US500), our clients became more involved when stock markets declined rather than rallied within that bear market. They appeared to follow the path of least resistance lower.
  • After Japan’s currency intervention in September to support the yen, traders tried to ‘catch the falling knife’ and buy the dip in USD/JPY following Japan’s second intervention in October.
  • In contrast to large non-commercial traders, Capital.com retail investors preferred short positions on EUR/USD in Q4 2022. They switched from long positions in the summer when the euro slipped below parity with the US dollar.
  • The strategy of buying the dip also came to light when our traders tried to chase cheap buys in the tech-heavy US100, after tech stocks achieved their lowest values since the Covid-19 pandemic began.
  • A divided bearish and bullish attitude in long and short positions developed in Q4, after China decided to loosen the zero-Covid policy which had been plaguing productivity since the pandemic began.
  • Only the equity and cryptocurrency markets saw an increase in the length of trades, while the total number of trades across all asset classes dropped off as traders battled with the most difficult trading conditions in a generation.
  • Turmoil in the cryptocurrency market induced by the collapse of the FTX exchange resulted in increased interest in the cryptos solana (SOL) and cronos (CRO). Dogecoin also saw increased interest following entrepreneur Elon Musk’s takeover of the social media platform Twitter.

Risk-management summary

Capital.com has seen record use of an important risk-management tool in Q4 2022 that lets our traders automatically exit a trade before losses mount up: stop-loss orders.

After a determined effort to educate our traders with guides and videos, the use of stop-loss orders on the Capital.com platform rose to 12.9% for the fourth quarter of 2022. For more about this, see below for Risk management: Stop-loss orders at record high.

Regular stop-loss orders are triggered automatically at the specified price level. However, they are not foolproof during times of heightened market volatility: if the asset price moves significantly past the stop-loss level in a matter of seconds, the order may be executed lower (or higher in the case of short trading) than the specified price, which effectively means that the loss will be greater than expected.

That’s why there’s also an option to set a guaranteed stop-loss (GSL) that guarantees to exit the position at the exact price set, despite the volatility. A guaranteed stop-loss typically comes at a cost as it involves the broker taking on extra risk. At Capital.com a guaranteed stop-loss is charged as a percentage on the opening volume for the client.

A look back on the trading trends of 2022

Following the pandemic’s two years of bullish moves in risky assets, 2022 has served as a reminder to Capital.com traders that markets may also fall and reverse their major trends.

The percentage of short trades on our platform grew from 26% in 2021 to 37% in 2022, indicating that our traders’ behaviour evolved in response to new market conditions. Market volatility increased the proportion of traders looking to profit during phases of market downside.

Short sentiment climbs +11% in 2022 from 2021

Yearly percentage of long and short positions

The index market had the greatest rise in the number of short trades, which reflects the year’s dismal equity performance. Since the beginning of 2022, the S&P 500 (US500) has lost about 20% of its value, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (US100) has lost even more (-32%). As a result, our traders were “chasing the momentum” by making more short trades on asset classes that were doing poorly.

Traders chased momentum in the index market

Short positions percentage change from previous year

Stop-loss orders increased in 2022

Persistent asset volatility in 2022 has prompted our traders to become more cautious, by increasing the number of transactions using stop-loss orders (see chart below). Concurrently, we saw a decline in the number of trades that had a take-profit order linked to them.

The proportion of trades including a stop loss increased from 9% in 2021 to approximately 13% in 2022. Simultaneously, the proportion of transactions with a take-profit fell from little more than 12% to 8%. This may indicate retail traders had a strong belief in riding out the ferocity of the bear market, and were reluctant to limit their potential returns while instead capping the downside from losses.

This is a common overconfidence bias that can influence trading behaviour. Investors may have believed they were entering a new major trend, and thus kept the door open to a potentially limitless upside. However, short-term market reversals within major trends operate against this strategy. We saw an example of such a bear market rally in July/August, and in the fourth quarter of 2022.

Stop-loss orders bounce back

Yearly percentage of trades using stop-losses vs take-profits

US100 and commodities dominated 2022’s most-traded assets

Aside from the US dollar, the Nasdaq and gold were perhaps two of the most closely tied assets to the trajectory in US Federal Reserve real interest rates.

Tighter monetary conditions diminished the valuation of risky assets such as technology stocks, and also reduced the incentive to purchase a non-yielding asset, such as gold.

After a big trend reversal from a decade-long bull market, our traders raised their trading interest in the US100 index. The tech-heavy index underperformed the wider US stock market (US500) and equity indices from other advanced countries.

Oil and natural gas were the two assets most tied to the escalating geopolitical risks following Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine in February 2022.

Key themes of Q4

Fed and BoE divergence trend ends: Traders rise to risk events

Central-bank meetings often produce market swings in many asset classes – particularly if speculative traders establish positions ahead of time, and then quickly buy or sell if caught on the wrong side of a trade. This was evident in the fourth quarter of 2022, with an interesting twist in sentiment at the November Federal Reserve and Bank of England meetings. The total number of cable trades spiked during both the Fed and BoE meetings, as would be expected.

Daniela Hathorn, senior analyst at Capital.com, said:

It is clear from the spike in total trades that our traders are actively trading risk events like the Fed and BoE meetings, to take advantage of volatile market conditions.

Prior to the meetings, the market was predominantly dollar-bullish. Between the start of the year and 26 September (when the pound hit a record low of $1.04), GBP/USD was down 23% as the dollar made strong ground against most rivals.

But, sentiment was already starting to turn. Headline US inflation, peaking at 9.1% in June, began to dip. While the Fed remained hawkish in August, economists were increasingly expecting a dovish pivot down the line.

This sentiment caught the attention of Capital.com traders. While markets had been pricing in the 0.75% rate hike that the Fed delivered in the November meeting – its third-consecutive hike at that level – traders were speculating that the central bank’s statement would reveal an increase in dovish sentiment from some of the Fed’s members.

The figures below show long GBP/USD trades fell in value going into the Fed meeting, while the value of short trades increased. These trends reversed, however, when the dovish pivot failed to materialise. Over the Fed’s two-day meeting, the pound lost nearly 3% against the dollar. But sentiment flipped again on 3 November, as the BoE made its own 0.75% hike – the bank’s biggest rate increase in three decades. GBP/USD longs re-emerged and short trades fell in value.

Hathorn said:

Despite chair Jerome Powell remaining highly hawkish at the Fed press conference, our traders had already reduced their GBP/USD shorts heading into the BoE meeting the following day. This resulted in our traders being net long at the close on 3 November and being able to benefit from the GBP/USD rally that followed.

Such has broadly been the pattern during the remaining weeks of 2022, as the dovish pivot by the Fed was increasingly speculated upon while the headline annual US inflation rate continued to dip. Indeed, that dovish pivot was finally seen during the Fed’s December meeting.

GBP/USD traders take advantage of volatile market conditions

Percentage of long and short positions vs total number of trades

Trouble for sterling: Huge trader interest as stop-loss orders increased

When the pound hit a record low of $1.035 on 26 September, following the disastrous mini-budget statement from the short-lived UK administration of Liz Truss, how did Capital.com traders respond to this volatile situation? Well, the number of GBP/USD trades hit its highest level for 2022 (and coincidentally the highest level since 2020). Meanwhile, the percentage of trades with stop-loss orders rose to 16.54% on 26 September – and it continued to rise, achieving 19.4% on 26 December.

Since the pound’s September downfall (and the ousting of Truss as prime minister and the sacking of her chancellor, Kwasi Kwarteng), sterling recovered to close 2022 at around $1.21, up by 16%. Capital.com traders have remained bearish on the currency pair, with short levels of between 48% and 55%.

Piero Cingari, market specialist at Capital.com, said:

The pound faced extremely high volatility in the latter two weeks of September, as Kwarteng’s mini-budget proposal of unfunded tax cuts triggered negative market reactions on gilts, resulting in significant selling pressure for the currency. Between 19 September and 26 September, the pound saw one of the worst weeks in its history, with a maximum drawdown of 10% echoing the volatility seen at the height of the 1992 sterling crisis. Looking at how our traders behaved, we can see that they chased the momentum by nearly tripling the number of trades, gradually diminishing their net-long holdings prior to actually switching to net-short positions, and becoming more cautious by increasing the number of trades with stop-loss orders. This shows us that retail traders are well engaged in the major risk events that impact a currency – and that they are ready to modify their positioning during moments of elevated volatility.

In addition, Justin McQueen, market specialist at Capital.com, saw the use of stop-loss orders as a positive step by Capital.com traders. McQueen said:

What was perhaps more encouraging was the increased use of stop-loss orders among traders during these highly volatile times, highlighting that retail traders were taking prudent steps to manage risk sufficiently in crisis markets. Our traders continue to lean bearish on the pound given that there is little in the way of good news surrounding the UK economy, which has been judged to be in a recession according to the UK’s Office for Budget Responsibility.

GBP/USD hits highest number of trades since 2020

Weekly number of trades

Bear market rallies repel traders while crashes attract them

Market crashes – the sudden decline in stock prices that usually follow a period of uncertainty, speculation, excessive optimism or an economic bubble – have presented some interesting data on how retail investors have behaved during these events. Importantly, Capital.com traders have been more involved during market crashes.

In the chart below, the two areas shaded grey represent the last two bear market rallies. According to Daniela Hathorn, market analyst at Capital.com, this shows that traders were focused on limiting their losses.

The data suggests that our traders have been more actively involved during the stock market sell-offs in 2022 than the rallies within that bear market,” said Hathorn. “During the two key rallies (June to August and October to November) our traders were net long, but they made greater use of stop-losses, which meant they were more concerned that the rally would wear out and they wanted to limit their losses. This suggests that overall, our traders were following the path of least resistance lower in the stock market.

Capital.com traders have been more involved during market crashes

US500 percentage of long and short positions vs total number of trades

USD/JPY: Currency intervention sparks opportunity to buy the dip

Since the Bank of Japan (BoJ) met in September, attention has been on the sliding Japanese yen. It has received a record amount of intervention from Japan, estimated to be worth more than $60bn.

Justin McQueen, senior market specialist at Capital.com, said:

This has been ultimately a futile effort by Japanese officials, given that the desire to strengthen the yen has been countered by the BoJ’s ultra-low rate policy, which – in an environment where central banks are raising rates rapidly – continues to exert pressure on JPY.

However, this did not deter Capital.com traders from trying to find an opportunity. McQueen added:

Following the prior currency intervention by Japanese officials in late September, which resulted in the initial USD/JPY being quickly retraced, traders used the second currency intervention in October as an opportunity to buy the dip (or in other words catch a falling knife) in USD/JPY. However, this meant that traders were fighting an active seller in USD/JPY with a lot of firepower from the Japanese Ministry of Finance.

Currency intervention creates opportunity for traders to buy the dip

Percentage of long and short positions vs total number of trades

EUR/USD: Retail investors adopt contrarian position on currency pair

According to the most recent Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Commitment of Traders report, large non-commercial traders have expanded their long holding on the euro to its highest level since the first quarter of 2021 – switching from a net short position held in the first half of the year.

Piero Cingari, market specialist at Capital.com said:

When it comes to retail traders who trade the EUR/USD pair on our platform, we see a different pattern. In addition to a notable increase in the number of traders since the beginning of the year, Capital.com’s traders have taken a fairly contrarian stance on the EUR/USD pair this year. Indeed, during the period of significant euro devaluation (March to September 2022) bullish positions dominated bearish ones, with just a few rare crosses. However, when the euro started to rebound in the last quarter of the year, sentiment shifted towards the bearish side.
Our traders appeared to favour the contrarian strategy of going long on the euro’s weakness in the summer, when the EUR dropped below parity levels against the USD, and subsequently going short on it when positive news came in at a later stage.

Cingari concluded.

Bearish sentiment as the euro rebounds

Percentage of long and short positions vs total number of trades

Retail investors looked to buy the dip in tech stocks

For traders seeking high rewards, increased risk in markets is often perceived as good news. It has been a tough year for the US stock market as a whole – the US500 has fallen by about 18%. But big tech appears to have suffered the largest decline – with the tech-heavy US100 down 32% year on year.

Capital.com’s data finds that bigger companies – such as Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), Meta Platforms (META) and Microsoft (MSFT) – have seen a post-dip rally, clearly showcasing the chase for cheap buys.

This was particularly true for the period after September 2022, when tech stocks achieved the lowest values since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. During the following month, our site recorded some of the year’s highest trade numbers for these companies.

Smaller influxes also occurred during periods approaching stock splits. Amazon, Alphabet (GOOG) and Tesla (TSLA) shares all underwent a stock split this year, which again coincided with an increase in trading.

Traders chasing tech stocks cheap buys

Weekly number of trades

Interest in CN50 and HK50 rises as China reopening speculation mounts

When China’s strict lockdown policies negatively affected its production, the equity market was unlikely to maintain its confidence in the country’s stocks. The world’s second-largest economy had employed a zero-Covid policy since the beginning of the pandemic, which meant that factories and offices were often shut for weeks if an employee tested positive.

This approach went on to negatively affect national production, consumption and exports, which not only reduced confidence in Chinese companies, but also those dependent on Chinese production.

The market outlook for Chinese companies turned bearish, and remained so for most of 2022. That is until October 2022, when frustration among workers began to spill over in aggressive nationwide protests against the Covid-19 lockdowns. The government then caved and loosened some of its policies.

However, data from Capital.com has revealed an increase in stock trades following this move, although market sentiment did not turn fully bullish. Piero Cingari, market specialist at Capital.com, said.

In contrast to what one would have anticipated, our traders appeared to ‘sell on the news’ by boosting the proportion of bearish views towards these assets. The percentage of short positions came close to matching the percentage of long positions on the China A50 (CN50) – and in the Hong Kong 50 (HK50) the two positions actually crossed paths. We are now witnessing a divided attitude in these markets, with a roughly equal share of bullish and bearish views.

Trading on CN50 and HK50 soars on speculation of a reopening

Percentage of long and short positions vs total number of trades

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.