Williams-Sonoma drops lawsuit against Quince over 'dupe' products

By Reuters News

By Blake Brittain

- Williams-Sonoma WSM.N has asked a California federal court to dismiss its lawsuit against online retailer Quince over its alleged "dupes" of Williams-Sonoma products.

  • The home-goods seller accused Quince of false advertising last year for selling allegedly inferior copies of Williams-Sonoma products while assuring customers that they were "Like Williams-Sonoma, but half the price"

  • US District Judge Edward Davila ruled against Williams-Sonoma in September after finding that Quince's ads were not misleading, but gave Williams-Sonoma permission to amend its claims

  • Williams-Sonoma filed a motion to dismiss the case without prejudice on Tuesday, which means it could still be refiled

  • Spokespeople for Williams-Sonoma did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the filing

  • Founded in 2018, Quince says its mission is to "create products of equal or greater quality than the leading luxury brands at a much lower price"

  • "These were serious allegations against a company that's challenging the traditional retail model," Quince head of legal Joel Dion said in a statement on Wednesday. "We stand behind our products, our advertising, and the value we deliver to consumers."

The case is Williams-Sonoma Inc v. Last Brand Inc d/b/a Quince, US District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 5:25-cv-10118

For Williams-Sonoma: Nathan Shaffer of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe

For Quince: Baldassare Vinti of Proskauer Rose

Read more:

Williams-Sonoma sues Quince over sales of 'dupe' products

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.