US FDA declines to approve Summit lung cancer drug after trial misses key survival goal

By Reuters News

- The US Food and Drug Administration on Sunday declined to approve Summit Therapeutics' SMMT.O lung cancer drug ivonescimab, a setback for efforts to expand treatment for patients whose cancer has progressed after earlier therapies.

In its so-called complete response letter, the FDA cited a late-stage trial showing that, while ivonescimab significantly delayed disease progression, it did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in overall survival.

The decision follows the drug's failure to achieve statistical significance on overall survival, a key measure of long-term treatment benefit, in a late-stage study that formed part of Summit's marketing application.

The agency concluded that the progression-free survival benefit alone did not support a favorable benefit-risk profile for approval.

Summit has argued that longer follow-up supports the drug's benefit, citing updated analyses that pointed to a lower risk of death across Western and Asian patient subgroups.



Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.