US Court Restricts Papaya Asset Transfers in Dispute With Firy Subsidiary Skillz

By Public Technologies
  • Delaware bankruptcy court barred transfers from Papaya's U.S. accounts on October 27, 2026, with limited exceptions for ordinary-course payments.
  • Papaya owes approximately $730 million to Firy's wholly owned subsidiary Skillz under a false-advertising judgment entered July 27, 2026.
  • Permitted payments require 115% prefunding from Papaya's overseas accounts; transfers to insiders or affiliates are prohibited.
  • The court found Papaya moved more than $70 million to Israel before trial without disclosing the transfers to the New York court.
  • Papaya has appealed the judgment but has not posted a bond securing it.


Disclaimer: This news brief was created by Public Technologies (PUBT) using generative artificial intelligence. While PUBT strives to provide accurate and timely information, this AI-generated content is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, investment, or legal advice. Firy Inc. published the original content used to generate this news brief via Business Wire (Ref. ID: 20261102543801) on November 02, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained therein.

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.