Switzerland's top court upholds Credit Suisse bonus cuts

By Reuters News

- Switzerland's highest court on Thursday said it had upheld cuts and cancellations of bonuses for the top three management levels of Credit Suisse following the Swiss bank's collapse, confirming the legality of the measure ordered by the finance ministry.

The Swiss Supreme Court overturned a previous ruling by the Federal Administrative Court, concluding that Swiss banking law provides sufficient legal basis for the bonus cuts.

  • Credit Suisse was acquired by competitor UBS UBSG.S in a state-engineered emergency takeover in March 2023

  • The finance ministry subsequently ordered the full or partial cancellation of accrued and future bonuses for senior staff across the entire bank, a measure that affected around 1,000 people

  • Some of the affected Credit Suisse managers challenged the measure at the Federal Administrative Court, which ruled in 2025 the bonus cuts had been unlawful

  • The Swiss government and UBS appealed, after which the Supreme Court upheld the bonus cuts in a ruling dated September 16

  • Bonuses should not be financed with public funds for business periods during which the need for state aid was created, the Supreme Court said in a statement

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.