Kuwait pension fund wins UK lawsuit to recoup money 'stolen' by late director

By Reuters News

- Kuwait's public pension fund on Thursday broadly won its London lawsuit against asset manager Man Group and others, in which it accused various banks and investment companies of laundering bribes paid to its late director.

The Public Institution for Social Security, which operates Kuwait's social security and pension scheme, had sued the estate of Fahad Al Rajaan at London's High Court in 2019, accusing him of corruptly siphoning off roughly $1 billion during his tenure.

Al Rajaan, PIFSS director from 1984 to 2014, was convicted in his absence of corruption and embezzling public money in Kuwait in 2016 and died in London in 2022.

PIFSS alleged that, over the course of two decades, Al Rajaan and his associates received at least $970 million in bribes, described as commission payments which banks and investment companies did not need to pay.

Judge Richard Jacobs said in a summary of his ruling that "PIFSS' claims for compensation against the various defendants were, broadly speaking, successful", but that the sums to be paid were still to be determined.

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.