H&R REIT unitholders reject breakup deal after failed vote

By Reuters News

- Canada's H&R Real Estate Investment Trust HR_u.TO said on Friday its unitholders voted against a previously announced C$6.7 billion ($4.7 billion) breakup deal.

The deal, announced in August, was meant to close a multi-year effort to simplify H&R's portfolio and sharpen its focus on residential real estate.

  • H&R had agreed to the breakup deal, under which GO Residential REIT was to acquire its residential portfolio in the US, while a group including Blackstone and entities tied to H&R CEO Tom Hofstedter would buy the other assets

  • Unitholders rejected the deal at a special meeting on Friday, prompting H&R to terminate the arrangement with immediate effect

  • No termination fee would be payable to the consortium, it said

  • H&R will also back away from a proposed purchase of a 70% interest in two joint venture development properties owned by Lantower Residential Real Estate Development Trust that it announced in October

  • The company plans to reinstate monthly distributions, pursue asset sales and begin a board rejig that would include CEO succession planning

($1 = 1.43 Canadian dollars)

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.