Aviva analysis sees GBP 60.2 million 10-year savings from flood-resilient new builds

By Public Technologies
  • Aviva analysis estimates adding £1,000 flood-resilience measures to new-build homes could avoid GBP 60.2 million in losses over 10 years.
  • Model assumes average flood claim of GBP 32,000, typical 8% property devaluation tied to long-term flood risk, resilience effectiveness of 50%.
  • Annual avoided costs for a single year’s cohort of new homes estimated at about GBP 7 million, or more than GBP 300 per home.
  • Payback period for the resilience package calculated at just over three years.
  • Consumer survey found 55% would pay GBP 1,000 more for a new home built with flood-resilience measures.


Disclaimer: This news brief was created by Public Technologies (PUBT) using generative artificial intelligence. While PUBT strives to provide accurate and timely information, this AI-generated content is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, investment, or legal advice. Aviva plc published the original content used to generate this news brief on October 14, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained therein.

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.