Why the Federal Reserve is ignoring a major economic warning

Economic uncertainty is at an all-time high. It’s higher today than during the pandemic in 2020—and several times higher than during the Great Recession in 2008.
Why the Federal Reserve is ignoring a major economic warning
Photo: bart sadowski pl/Shutterstock.com

In other words, nobody knows what economic turns are coming next from the White House. That’s mostly because of the massive tariffs that Trump has slapped on nearly all American trading partners. The scale of these tariffs took nearly everybody by surprise, and the rollout has been unpredictable, to say the least.

Past performance isn’t a reliable indicator of future results

That kind of uncertainty has put the Federal Reserve under mounting pressure to lower rates to support the market. A lot of that pressure has come from President Trump himself. He has personally criticised Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Truth Social. In a post on 21 April, Trump called Powell ‘Mr Too Late’, urging him to lower rates now to avoid a slowdown.

But Jerome Powell isn’t taking that advice—at least not yet.

The Fed was cutting rates in mid-2024, as inflation was coming down. But they stopped cutting late last year, and the Fed funds rate has remained flat since January 2025. In December, they reduced the number of anticipated rate cuts in 2025 from four down to two. The Fed is widely expected to keep rates flat until September.

Powell has explained this cautious approach by pointing to uncertainty surrounding Trump’s tariffs and how they’ll affect prices—calling it a ‘wait-and-see’ approach until the impact of tariffs is clearer.

But why won’t the Fed just lower interest rates to support the market?

The Fed follows a dual mandate: stable prices and maximum employment. The goal is to maintain steady economic growth—not too fast, and not too slow. Economic expansion naturally ebbs and flows in a process known as the business cycle.

During periods of economic expansion, the economy grows, unemployment is low, and inflation typically rises. To prevent overheating, the Fed usually raises rates. That slows things down, helps cool inflation and may cause a modest rise in unemployment.

During contractions, the economy tends to face higher unemployment and lower inflation. This is when we typically expect the Fed to cut rates to stimulate the economy.

So, where do we stand today?

The current unemployment rate sits at about 4.4%. That’s relatively low and not a concern for the Fed. One of their mandates is maximum employment, and 4–5% unemployment is about as low as it gets.

However, unemployment has been inching up since around mid-2022, when it sat at 3.6%. The high level of uncertainty is also having an effect on employment.

Let’s look back at the chart from earlier showing economic uncertainty. If we overlay the NFIB’s three-month hiring plans (inverted), we can see a strong link between uncertainty and hiring. The more uncertainty, the fewer companies plan to hire.

That could be a red flag.

The extreme level of policy uncertainty we’re seeing right now could accelerate the uptick in unemployment. That might put pressure on the Fed to lower rates sooner than planned—making borrowing cheaper, helping companies hire more and supporting employment.

And as hesitant as they are to cut too soon, they do have room to do so. The Fed funds rate currently sits at 4.3%, which is relatively high. That gives them flexibility to cut if they decide they need to stabilise markets or cushion a slowdown.

So, if they’ve got the firepower, why don’t they use it?

Because the Fed also has to keep an eye on inflation. They aim to keep it around 2%—low and steady—to maintain price stability and support economic growth.

Despite concerns that tariffs could push prices up, inflation has actually been falling over the past year. But there’s another measure the Fed is watching: expected inflation. And that has already shot up because of the tariffs.

Just look at the one-year inflation expectations chart—it shows a sharp rise over the past six months. Consumers are clearly factoring in tariff-driven price increases. The Fed will be watching closely to see if this is just a short-term panic, or a longer-term issue.

If prices start rising again, the chances of a rate increase could go up. The Fed will be careful not to move too soon—doing so brings the risk of recession. But they also don’t want inflation to get out of control again.

As much as Trump wants the Fed to cut rates now, doing so too early could backfire. It might trigger inflation from both high tariffs and stronger consumer spending.

In the near term, we’re likely to see a cautious Fed—moving slowly and watching the data. As the tariffs take effect, they may have a clearer picture by the time of their meetings in mid-June or late July.

For better or worse, we’ll be keeping an eye on it. At Capital.com, we’ll continue to post videos to keep you informed on the latest market trends and financial news.

Explore more expert insights in our Educational Hub.

  

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.