Zheneng Jinjiang's top shareholder offers to take company private in $782 million deal

By Reuters News

- Zheneng Jinjiang Environment's ZHEN.SI top shareholder, Zhejiang Provincial Energy Group, offered on Tuesday to take the Singapore-listed waste-to-energy firm private in a deal valuing it at about S$1.0 billion ($782 million).

The offer of S$0.70 per share in cash represents a 29.6% premium to Zheneng Jinjiang's closing price on September 24. In place of cash, Zhejiang Provincial also offered shares.

Chinese state-backed Zhejiang Provincial and its units, which supply nearly half of the electricity consumed in Zhejiang Province, are the top shareholder of Zheneng Jinjiang holding a near 30% stake, the companies said in a joint statement.

Zhejiang Provincial said privatization and delisting would give management more flexibility to run the business, noting the company had not tapped equity markets for funds since 2018.

Zheneng Jinjiang's board recommended a special dividend of S$0.045 per share, which totals to S$64.6 million in capital return to shareholders.


($1 = 1.2785 Singapore dollars)

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.