UK's Smiths Group profit beats forecasts, moves to offload US asbestos liability

By Reuters News

Sept 22 (Reuters) - British engineering firm Smiths Group SMIN.L reported a better-than-expected full-year operating profit on Tuesday and launched a process to sell its US asbestos liability, as the 175-year-old company completed a sweeping portfolio overhaul that netted more than £3 billion ($4.01 billion).

The results mark a first full-year showing for a slimmed-down Smiths, which has reshaped itself into a focused industrial technologies group serving energy, industrial and construction markets after shedding its detection and interconnect businesses under pressure from US activist investor Engine Capital.

Smiths also launched a marketing process to divest its largest unit's legacy US asbestos liability, which, if successful, would remove the liability from its balance sheet, increase free cash flow and reduce earnings volatility.

The company's full-year adjusted operating profit of £399 million for the year ended July 31 came above a company-compiled analyst consensus of £388 million.

($1 = 0.7478 pounds)

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.