British hotel operator Whitbread's shareholders reject Corvex-backed director

By Reuters News

- Premier Inn-owner Whitbread WTB.L on Monday said its shareholders have voted against major investor Corvex Management's demand to appoint its nominee James Gemmel as a director on the UK-based hotel operator's board.

Here are more details:

  • Whitbread said 83.41% of its shareholders voted against the resolution to appoint James Gemmel to the board at its General Meeting on Monday

  • Excluding the shares voted by Corvex, 91% of votes cast were against the resolution

  • US-based Corvex has been campaigning for a seat on Whitbread's board after dropping its push for a sale, arguing that the firm's strategic review had failed to address underlying challenges

  • Whitbread had urged shareholders to reject the fund's board bid, arguing it could risk execution as the company focuses on a turnaround plan that includes job cuts and closures of branded restaurants

  • "We will now continue to focus on delivering our five-year plan, which has clear and measurable milestones to drive significant value for shareholders, and which we are already executing at pace," Chair Christine Hodgson said

  • Corvex did not immediately comment on the vote

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.