Kim Stephenson is a former financial adviser who retrained as a psychologist. Being a financial psychologist possibly makes him unique. The British Psychological Society thinks so.
Asked for the names of some of experts in financial psychology, a BPS spokesperson says: “It’s not an area in which we have a huge number of people.” The BPS puts forward only one person: Kim Stephenson.
And Stephenson has some unique opinions to match. He dismisses much of the orthodoxy surrounding investment advice based on risk profiles, and counters the traditional view that trading biases that divert investors from using logic are universally bad.
Each investor is unique
Independent financial advisers (IFAs) have to use risk profiles, yet Stephenson rubbishes them.
“99% of risk profiles are not psychometrically valid. They are about as good as a quiz in Cosmopolitan magazine. You could use a horoscope out of the paper,” he says. “The risk profile is just a conversation starter.”
He is equally scathing about general concepts of trading biases. “A lot of advice on biases and trading is based on averages, but for that advice to work the individual must have 2.4 children and a live in a 3.1 bedroomed house. They don’t. Each person is unique.”
Sex and money
Stephenson’s starting point is that people need to be more open and honest about their finances and their investment needs.
“There was a survey of university students and the outcome was that males and females were far more comfortable talking about the sex they were going to have after the meal than who was going to pay for the meal before they had sex,” he says.
“For previous generations sex was taboo, now it’s money.”
Open about finances
Ditch the risk profiles, says Stephenson, and focus on what it is people are investing for.
Each individual needs to consider their personal choices and those of their ‘significant others’. “If someone did get a load of money what would their priorities be and are they the same as their partner?” he asks.
“If they become millionaires, yes they both want a big house, but he sees it as a status symbol and wants a massive car in the garage; she wants a nest for the kids with a huge safe play area and a pool. If your investments do well, you are going to end up divorced if you are not careful.
“The most difficult job of all is to be honest and to sit down with your nearest and dearest and think what you want your life to be like.” As an example, he says: “You might be well paid but in a job you hate.” Quit it, is his advice.
What to do with your money
The questions you need to ask if, for example, you are saving for your retirement, include:
- What does retirement mean to you?
- Are you going to continue working, doing a bit of consultancy?
- Are you going to write that novel you always said you were going to write?
- Are you going to travel?
- What really motivates you?
“If you’ve got a very clear idea of what you want to do, instead of playing around for the next six months or year or even just for right now, you can think about the future. It’s a lot easier to invest for 15 years’ time,” he says.
The trouble is, our heritage gets in the way. We’re the ancestors of hunter gatherers, insists Stephenson and that is why we don’t save well or invest long-term. “One of the big biases is that all human beings are very ‘now’ focused.
“When we were hunter gatherers if you got obsessed with what was going to happen next year, you’d miss the prey today and your family would go hungry. You’d die and so would all your family and you would not pass on your genes.
“So the families who survived and did pass on their genes – the ancestors of all of us now, thousands of generations later – are people who discounted the future hugely.