Paul Weiss calls bid to disqualify law firm in sugar antitrust case ‘gamesmanship’

By Reuters News

By Mike Scarcella

WASHINGTON, Sept 24 (Reuters) - Law firm Paul Weiss urged a federal judge in Minnesota on Wednesday to reject a bid from Mondelēz and other major food manufacturers to disqualify the firm from defending Domino Sugar and its owner ASR Group in a group of lawsuits over alleged price-fixing in ​the sugar industry.

Here are the details:

  • In its court filing, Paul Weiss denied the food manufacturers’ claim that the firm has a conflict of interest based on its earlier effort to represent the companies as plaintiffs in the same litigation.

  • The law firm said the lead Paul Weiss attorneys who pitched representing the food companies have since left the firm. Paul Weiss criticized the move to disqualify the firm as “strategic gamesmanship at its worst and entirely without merit.”

  • ASR and Domino in a separate filing on Wednesday defended Paul Weiss and urged the court not to disqualify the firm. “ASR/Domino would lose the attorneys who know their business, the industry, and the issues better than anyone," they said.

  • Mondelez, ASR and Paul Weiss did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

  • The manufacturers in seeking to oust Paul Weiss argue that they provided confidential strategy and pricing data to the firm in 2024 when they were preparing to bring the case and ​the law firm was vying to represent them. Paul Weiss countered that the only information sent to the firm was "historical purchasing data from just one of the plaintiffs."

  • Mondelez's lawsuit and a group of similar cases allege ASR and other sugar producers engaged in illegal price coordination. A judge last year allowed groups of proposed class actions to advance. ASR and other defendants have denied any wrongdoing.

  • The lead Paul Weiss attorneys who earlier sought to represent the ​food manufacturer plaintiffs, including William ​Isaacson, left the firm last year ⁠to open a new law firm.

  • Paul Weiss became involved in the case as defense counsel for ASR and Domino in September last year, when Djordje Petkoski, the lead attorney for ​the companies, joined Paul Weiss from rival law firm A&O Shearman.



Read more:

US judge urged to oust law firm Paul Weiss from sugar price-fixing case

Law firm Quinn Emanuel wins fight over role in data center case

Quinn Emanuel's ​conflict battles highlight thorny challenge for big law firms

Law firm Quinn Emanuel ousted from defamation case against Muddy Waters

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.