Intesa's MPS bid set to redraw Italian banking landscape

By Reuters News

By Valentina Za

- Italy's Intesa Sanpaolo has sweetened its €34 billion ($38 billion) share-and-cash bid for Monte dei Paschi di Siena BMPS.MI and won the backing of its target's main investor.

But the bid by Italy's largest lender for the country's biggest mid-sized bank has stirred competition concerns after two years of sector consolidation.

The next hurdle for Intesa ISP.MI is a decision by Italy's antitrust authority, which a person close to the matter said is due between the middle and end of November.

Here's a look in four charts at the competitive structure of the euro zone's fourth-largest banking market.

ANTITRUST HURDLE

Italy's antitrust body is expected to eventually clear Intesa's acquisition of MPS with conditions. The authority, which last month opened an in-depth probe into the deal, declined to comment.

Intesa ISP.MI has already agreed to sell half of MPS' branches, echoing a scheme it used in a 2020 deal that turned it into Italy's biggest bank.

Of the 635 MPS branches it will sell, Intesa has irrevocably selected 445, while it can make changes to another 190 to help with any further antitrust problems.

Intesa could have to sell more branches than planned, two people close to the matter said, with one saying it may have to shed up to 50 more.

Antitrust measures could also affect the stake in insurer Generali GASI.MI that Intesa will gain through MPS, the people said.

HOW FRAGMENTED IS ITALIAN BANKING?

Italy has sharply reduced banking fragmentation.

A bad loan crisis led to rescue deals, including a government-funded sale of two banks to Intesa in 2017, and a reform forced cooperative lenders to merge.

Germany has seen a much smaller rise in the ECB concentration index.

Italy's latest consolidation round has seen roughly a dozen deal proposals surface since late 2024, of which half went through.

The completion of MPS' reprivatisation in November 2024, after a 2017 bailout, kickstarted the process. It was expected to bring together other second-tier players: Banco BPM BAMI.MI and BPER EMII.MI.

But UniCredit CRDI.MI upended a prospective MPS-BPM tie-up and forced MPS to pursue merchant bank Mediobanca instead.

The deal restored MPS to third place among Italian banks, but with less than a third of Intesa's assets.

To fight off Intesa, MPS CEO Luigi Lovaglio proposed buying both BPM and wealth manager Banca Generali BGN.MI, but the chances of shareholder approval for his scheme have dwindled after the top MPS investor on Sunday sided with Intesa.

WHAT NEXT?

Under Intesa's plan, Unipol-owned BPER will surge to third place in Italian banking by adding 635 MPS branches.

That would leave a very significant size gap between Italy's top two banks and the country's third largest.

BPM could claim the No.3 spot if a merger with the Italian arm of France's Credit Agricole (CA) CAGR.PA, its main shareholder and a supporter of the deal, goes through.

But it would still be a distant third to Intesa and UniCredit, while increasing concentration measured as the proportion of assets held by the top five banks.

This would rise further if UniCredit pursues plans to buy any assets others have to shed for antitrust purposes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR BANK RATES

Concentration is good for profit margins, with Spanish and Italian banks gaining from the 2022-2024 rate-hiking cycle more than German and French rivals because they managed to pass higher rates on to borrowers more quickly than to savers.

French and German households were quicker to move their money into higher-yielding time deposits, while sight deposits remained predominant in Italy and Spain.

($1 = 0.8935 euros)


Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.