Family Dollar reaches $63 million settlement with US FTC, states over customer overcharges

By Reuters News

- Family Dollar reached a $63 million settlement with the US Federal Trade Commission and 17 states of allegations that the discount retailer overcharged shoppers, including by charging more at the register than it advertises on its website and mobile app.

According to settlement papers filed on Thursday in the Norfolk, Virginia federal court, Family Dollar will offer $40 million of restitution and $20 million of future discounts to eligible shoppers, and pay $3 million to the states.

The FTC and states accused Family Dollar of violating federal and state laws against deceptive practices, "betraying the trust" of millions of American consumers who rely on it for essentials, and "imposing significant financial harm on the communities that can least afford it."

Family Dollar did not admit or deny wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. The Chesapeake, Virginia-based company and its lawyer did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Family Dollar has more than 8,000 stores, according to its website.

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.