Climate change targets to have unexpected impact on Asia FX

By Paul Golden

Edited by Aaron Woolner

00:00, 3 January 2022

Share this article

Have a confidential tip for our reporters?

Loy Yang brown coal power station at night, Victoria, Australia
Loy Yang brown coal power station at night, Victoria, Australia – Photo: Shutterstock

The link between climate change and currencies may not be obvious. But many Asian countries are both importers and exporters of fossil fuels, and commitments to reduce carbon emissions will have knock-on effects on their current accounts and therefore currency strength. 

Fossil fuels create a sizable economic impression in countries where resource extraction and refining occur, impacting current accounts and ultimately the value of currencies themselves. 

For major exporters this will have a profound effect as the size and importance of the sector will be difficult to substitute, eroding the value of the national currency by reducing the surplus effect on the balance of payments, says Peter Rosenstreich, head of investment products at Swissquote.

“In contrast, renewable energy will positively impact countries in two distinct ways,” he says. 

“Firstly, countries with a deep reliance on imported fossil fuels that shift to renewables will see the benefit of diminished external capital flows and reduced potential political entanglements. 

“Secondly, countries with fragmented energy infrastructure will find regional renewable hubs cheaper, quicker to build, and less complexity to manage.”

India and China the biggest winners

In this scenario, Rosenstreich suggests countries such as China and India have the most to gain.

An article published in research journal Nature Energy in November suggested that China could be left with more than $1trn of “stranded” energy assets as a result of net zero policies by 2036. But despite seeing more than half its fossil fuel assets rendered worthless, the research suggests China will still enjoy gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 7.1% by the middle of the next decade.

Trevor Allen, BNP Paribas sustainable finance analyst, says that China is a key beneficiary of solar power expansion as the manufacturing base for around two-thirds of the world’s solar panels. 

It appears unlikely that China will be able to significantly reduce its use of coal in the near future. Given that fossil fuel is the dominant source of the country’s energy, what China will do instead is look to cleaner uses of coal.

BNP Paribas chief China economist, Chen XingdongBNP Paribas chief China economist, Chen Xingdong – Photo: BNP Paribas

China invests in renewables 

China has committed not to invest in or finance new coal thermal power stations overseas, which will reduce its exports of thermal power equipment – an area in which it is strong says BNP Paribas chief China economist, Chen Xingdong.

“But it is also determined to speed up renewable energy production and restructure energy consumption and that will drive energy technology advances, reshaping industrial structure and sources of growth,” he adds.

“China had built 534GW capacity of wind power and solar energy by 2020 and is committed to increase that to 1200GW by 2030.”

Indonesia and Malaysia worse off

Energy importer Japan is expected to see a 4.5% expansion in its economy by 2036. However, the biggest winners can be found elsewhere in Asia with Kazakhstan, India and the Asean countries excluding Indonesia and Malaysia predicted to exceed 10% GDP growth and encouraging forecasts for Taiwan (9.6%), South Korea (8.9%) and Indonesia (7.3%). Australian GDP growth is forecast at 4%.

“Indonesia’s economy is likely to benefit from greater demand for nickel as more countries look to increase electrification and storage,” explains Allen. 

“This is notwithstanding the higher carbon footprint from nickel produced in Indonesia, although this is not likely to affect exports in the near term so the country may have some time to look at ways to reduce emissions in the production process.”

Asia’s outsized impact on fossil fuels

The Nature Energy article noted that production of the renewables technology is increasingly concentrated in a few regions, including China, which would also benefit from a reduction in fossil fuel imports as money not spent on expensive energy imports is spent domestically, and output is boosted by major low carbon investment programmes.

With Asia being home to three of the world’s largest fossil fuel importers (China, India and Japan) the region will have a disproportionate impact on how rapidly fossil energy markets decline.

This might all sound like bad news for Australia. However, Adam Button, chief currency analyst at ForexLive says the market is “sleeping” on the opportunity in carbon capture and underground storage.

“Major government money is headed in that direction and the prize is enormous,” he explains. “If Australian companies grow into global champions in that space they could be as large as the biggest domestic energy companies. Carbon capture will be a huge investment theme in 2022 and a source of investment flows.”

Kit Juckes, chief global foreign exchange strategist at Societe GeneraleSociete Generale chief global foreign exchange strategist Kit Juckes – Photo: Societe Generale

Long-time horizon for transition

The difficulty in evaluating the environmental element of currency valuations is that it requires consideration of factors that do not necessarily provide a consistent outcome, says Kit Juckes, chief global foreign exchange strategist at Societe Generale.

“A ban on coal production and use would clearly affect the Australian economy heavily, so market analysts would want to know what the plan is for when the commodity runs out or is no longer valuable,” he says.

The time frames involved also need to be taken into account – a lot can happen in 29 months, let alone 29 years – so the countries affected have time to adapt to new industries.

“With that in mind, it is impossible to say how net zero will affect specific currencies,” says Craig Erlam, senior market analyst UK & EMEA at Oanda. 

“If we were talking about a shorter time horizon the impact would be more severe, but the targets set out take into consideration that some countries need more time to avoid significant consequences.”

Multiple factors involved

In theory, the currencies of traditional energy producers should come under pressure. Markets were given a snapshot of what this might look like earlier this year when China refused to clear Australian coal and AUD/USD declined by more than 8% over a three-month period.

But Alex Kuptsikevich, senior financial analyst at FxPro says 2021 has also shown that the world is not ready to give up on fossil fuels as quickly as China has tried to do this year.

“Therefore, only very long term plans to reduce the use of fossil fuels should be taken seriously,” he suggests. “The impact on currencies would then be difficult to separate from other factors such as balance of payments and monetary policy.”

Transition threatens dollar dominance

Kuptsikevich reckons traders betting against the likes of the Australian dollar or Russian ruble would be jumping the gun and is confident that there will be another commodity super-cycle before the final decline of fossil energy.

The biggest foreign exchange impact of energy transition could be a decline in the greenback, given that oil is almost always traded in dollars. 

“Recycled dollars are used to purchase US securities, which then help to keep interest rates low and growth high - a meaningful step towards ending the dollar’s role as the global reserve currency,” concludes Rosenstreich.

Read more: China DeFi sector booms despite regulators’ crypto crackdown

The difference between trading assets and CFDs
The main difference between CFD trading and trading assets, such as commodities and stocks, is that you don’t own the underlying asset when you trade on a CFD.
You can still benefit if the market moves in your favour, or make a loss if it moves against you. However, with traditional trading you enter a contract to exchange the legal ownership of the individual shares or the commodities for money, and you own this until you sell it again.
CFDs are leveraged products, which means that you only need to deposit a percentage of the full value of the CFD trade in order to open a position. But with traditional trading, you buy the assets for the full amount. In the UK, there is no stamp duty on CFD trading, but there is when you buy stocks, for example.
CFDs attract overnight costs to hold the trades (unless you use 1-1 leverage), which makes them more suited to short-term trading opportunities. Stocks and commodities are more normally bought and held for longer. You might also pay a broker commission or fees when buying and selling assets direct and you’d need somewhere to store them safely.
Capital Com is an execution-only service provider. The material provided on this website is for information purposes only and should not be understood as an investment advice. Any opinion that may be provided on this page does not constitute a recommendation by Capital Com or its agents. We do not make any representations or warranty on the accuracy or completeness of the information that is provided on this page. If you rely on the information on this page then you do so entirely on your own risk.

Still looking for a broker you can trust?


Join the 380.000+ traders worldwide that chose to trade with Capital.com

1. Create & verify your account

2. Make your first deposit

3. You’re all set. Start trading