7-Eleven ends lawsuit against Nike over shoes with store's colors

By Reuters News

By Blake Brittain

- 7-Eleven will dismiss a trademark lawsuit that accused Nike NKE.N of copying its signature orange, green and ​red stripe design for a pair of Air Max 95 shoes, the convenience store chain told a Dallas federal court.

  • 7-Eleven on Monday moved to dismiss its case with prejudice, which means it cannot be refiled

  • Spokespeople for the companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment or for more information on the filing, including whether the dispute was settled

  • Irving, Texas-based 7-Eleven sued Nike on July 2 in an attempt to block sales of the sneakers, which were set for release on July 11, or "7-Eleven Day"

  • 7-Eleven alleged that Nike designed the shoe to evoke the convenience store and said consumers would mistakenly believe the ​shoe was sponsored or ​endorsed by the chain

  • Nike did not respond to the allegations in court

The case is 7-Eleven Inc v. Nike Inc, US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, No. 3:26-cv-02201.

For 7-Eleven: Cole Ramey of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton

For Nike: attorney information not available

Read more:

7-Eleven sues Nike over Air Max with Slurpee maker's colors

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.