Australia's Perpetual falls after rejecting EQT's latest bid; Citi downbeat on business outlook

By Reuters News

** Shares of Perpetual PPT.AX fall nearly 16% to A$16.50, their biggest intraday pct decline since November 2022

** Shares hit their lowest level since July 1

** The asset manager rejects another higher takeover offer from EQT AB EQTAB.ST

** The A$22.5-per-share offer represents a 14.8% premium over the stock's last close

** Offer is above the group's earlier bids of A$21.64 a share on July 1 and A$22.07 mid-July

** Citi analysts say the rejection would mean PPT's engagement with EQT ends

** Brokerage says Perpetual's earnings outlook remains under pressure due to continued client outflows from its asset management business, particularly higher-margin equity funds

** However, Citi flags some investors may still be hoping for a rival takeover bid, which could help support the stock

** Two of five analysts rate the stock "buy" and three "hold"; their median PT is A$21.53, LSEG-compiled data shows

** Stock down 10.6% YTD, including moves in the current session

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.