CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 79% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
US English

Wetherspoon (JDW) stock falls amid shareholder spat

By Jenni Reid

08:25, 30 November 2021

Exterior of a Wetherspoons pub in Holborn, London
Wetherspoon has accused two of its shareholders of taking an overly inflexible approach to governance rules – Photo: Shutterstock

British pub chain JD Wetherspoon (JDW) released an official statement today in a continuation of its public dispute with some of its investors over the tenure of non-executive directors (NEDs) as members of its board, which it says are taking an “inflexible interpretation” of corporate governance rules.

The dispute relates to recent votes against the reappointment of two of Wetherspoon’s NEDs and the nine-year limit recommended in the UK Corporate Governance Code.

Investors did not seem to enjoy the latest round of mud-slinging, however, with Wetherspoon stock falling by 2.6% to £86.34 in early trading on the London Stock Exchange.

Back-and-forth debate

Last week, Wetherspoon said that some investors were taking a “box-ticking approach to corporate governance and were not adhering themselves to the rules they required of investees”.

It accused shareholder Fidelity International of hypocrisy for voting against the reappointment of NEDs over the nine-year rule.

The fund manager defended its adherence to the rules in a recent Daily Telegraph report by saying that “a majority of the Fidelity International Limited board members joined the board within the past nine years”.

Wetherspoon today hit back saying that it was impossible to verify the length of service of Fidelity International’s website and that the investor’s public documents had no mention of adherence to a nine-year rule.

It also said Fidelity’s remarks in the Daily Telegraph did not necessarily mean it was compliant with the UK code that stipulates that a majority of independent non-executive directors must have joined in the last nine years, not merely a majority of board members.

What is your sentiment on JDW?

Vote to see Traders sentiment!

More Fidelity

The pub chain has also called into question the relationship between Fidelity International and Wetherspoon shareholder Fidelity Investments, which voted against chairman Tim Martin and the company’s three executive directors, but in favour of all NEDs, including two opposed by Fidelity International.

Wetherspoon said in its previous release that Fidelity Investments did not have a majority of independent directors and did not transparently disclose the length of tenure of its four directors.

A Fidelity International spokesman told the Daily Telegraph that the two firms were “completely separate entities”.


244.94 Price
+0.320% 1D Chg, %
Long position overnight fee -0.0262%
Short position overnight fee 0.0040%
Overnight fee time 22:00 (UTC)
Spread 0.32


126.39 Price
-1.080% 1D Chg, %
Long position overnight fee -0.0262%
Short position overnight fee 0.0040%
Overnight fee time 22:00 (UTC)
Spread 0.29


482.03 Price
+0.220% 1D Chg, %
Long position overnight fee -0.0262%
Short position overnight fee 0.0040%
Overnight fee time 22:00 (UTC)
Spread 0.13


16.45 Price
-0.250% 1D Chg, %
Long position overnight fee -0.0262%
Short position overnight fee 0.0040%
Overnight fee time 22:00 (UTC)
Spread 0.26

Wetherspoon today said this was “stretching a point” since Fidelity Investments CEO and chairman Abigail Johnson was a director of Fidelity International. has contacted Fidelity Investments and Fidelity International for comment on Wetherspoon’s latest statement.

Favourable response

Regarding the nine-year limit, Wetherspoon argues that the UK corporate governance code states that individual company circumstances can be taken into account, and that experienced non-executive directors are needed.

Today, Wetherspoon founder and chairman Tim Martin commented: “Wetherspoon has been a PLC [public limited company] since its flotation in 1992. During that time, relationships with shareholders have been generally harmonious. We recognise that sensible corporate governance is necessary and beneficial.

“However, an inflexible interpretation of the nine-year rule, and other rules, can result in perverse outcomes and has generally resulted in inexperienced and vulnerable boards of directors in the UK – with, for example, almost no NEDs on boards today who have had experience of the last recession (2008–2010) at their current company.

“Wetherspoon has explained its position and has had a generally favourable response from institutional shareholders to its approach.”


Martin added: “These sorts of issues, for many PLCs, seem to stem from the way in which the corporate governance personnel, who work for major institutions, cast their votes for annual general meetings.

“We believe it's important for the future of our business, and for the UK economy, for the comply or explain aspect of the Code to be more closely adhered to, in practice, by institutional investors – and for investors to practice what they preach.”

Wetherspoon stock has fallen 15.96% this year after reversing gains made during a summer rebound in hospitality, and after a November trading update revealed sales had fallen below pre-pandemic levels in recent months.

Read more: Wetherspoon (JDW) suffers decline in older drinkers

Markets in this article

6.92 USD
-0.28 -3.930%

Rate this article

The difference between trading assets and CFDs
The main difference between CFD trading and trading assets, such as commodities and stocks, is that you don’t own the underlying asset when you trade on a CFD.
You can still benefit if the market moves in your favour, or make a loss if it moves against you. However, with traditional trading you enter a contract to exchange the legal ownership of the individual shares or the commodities for money, and you own this until you sell it again.
CFDs are leveraged products, which means that you only need to deposit a percentage of the full value of the CFD trade in order to open a position. But with traditional trading, you buy the assets for the full amount. In the UK, there is no stamp duty on CFD trading, but there is when you buy stocks, for example.
CFDs attract overnight costs to hold the trades (unless you use 1-1 leverage), which makes them more suited to short-term trading opportunities. Stocks and commodities are more normally bought and held for longer. You might also pay a broker commission or fees when buying and selling assets direct and you’d need somewhere to store them safely.
Capital Com is an execution-only service provider. The material provided on this website is for information purposes only and should not be understood as an investment advice. Any opinion that may be provided on this page does not constitute a recommendation by Capital Com or its agents. We do not make any representations or warranty on the accuracy or completeness of the information that is provided on this page. If you rely on the information on this page then you do so entirely on your own risk.

Still looking for a broker you can trust?

Join the 570.000+ traders worldwide that chose to trade with

1. Create & verify your account 2. Make your first deposit 3. You’re all set. Start trading