Piper Sandler starts Ares, Carlyle with overweight ratings

By Reuters News

** Piper Sandler initiates coverage of alternative asset managers Ares Management ARES.N and Carlyle Group CG.O with overweight ratings.

** The brokerage sees ARES as a premium player and leader in alts space with premier credit platform.

** Piper says ARES direct lending to improve in near term, which should benefit credit management fees.

** For CG, the brokerage points to slower growth than peers but sees a strong outlook and valuation as attractive entry point.

** "We view Carlyle as too cheap to ignore with improving growth areas and attractive 2028 targets that should lead to multiple expansion if met," Piper said.

** Piper says alternatives remain an underperformer, but fundamentals are healthier than headlines that weighed on the sector.

** The brokerage also sees digital infrastructure and AI as secular growth themes that could create significant capital deployment opportunities over the coming quarters and years that should benefit the sector.

** As of the last close, CG was down about 32.5% year to date, while ARES was down about 24.8%.

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.