Liquidia infringes two United Therapeutics patent claims in Yutrepia Hatch-Waxman case, judge rules

By Public Technologies
  • Delaware federal court found Liquidia’s YUTREPIA infringed two asserted claims of United Therapeutics’ U.S. Patent No. 11,826,327.
  • Court upheld claims 1 and 14 as valid and infringed; other asserted claims were ruled invalid.
  • Parties must submit a proposed judgment within one week, including remedies for the infringement finding.
  • Potential remedies include removing the PH-ILD indication from YUTREPIA’s label or broader limits on market availability.
  • Liquidia plans to appeal, citing disagreement with the ruling on the two upheld claims.


Disclaimer: This news brief was created by Public Technologies (PUBT) using generative artificial intelligence. While PUBT strives to provide accurate and timely information, this AI-generated content is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, investment, or legal advice. Liquidia Corporation published the original content used to generate this news brief via GlobeNewswire (Ref. ID: 202609301320PRIMZONEFULLFEED9837151) on September 30, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained therein.

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.