Harvest faces tighter CGP compliance under AMF, ACPR, DDA and MiFID II rules

By Public Technologies
  • Harvest SA highlighted tightening compliance demands on French wealth managers under AMF, ACPR, DDA, and MiFID II rules, increasing ongoing documentation and suitability obligations across client files.
  • The framework also reinforces anti-money laundering controls under LCB-FT, including client identification, beneficial owner checks, transaction monitoring, recordkeeping, and potential reporting to TRACFIN.
  • The document flagged training requirements of 7 hours a year for AMF-supervised CIF activity, rising to 15 hours a year for insurance distribution under the DDA.
  • It did not mention tariffs.


Disclaimer: This news brief was created by Public Technologies (PUBT) using generative artificial intelligence. While PUBT strives to provide accurate and timely information, this AI-generated content is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, investment, or legal advice. Harvest SA published the original content used to generate this news brief on September 14, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained therein.

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.