Credit Acceptance Corp to forgive hundreds of millions in debt to resolve consumer protection case

By Reuters News

- Credit Acceptance Corp CACC.O will pay $75.5 million, forgive more than $630 million of consumer debt, and reform its lending practices to resolve allegations by most U.S. state attorneys general that the subprime auto lender violated various consumer protection laws, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said on Thursday.

The settlement resolves allegations that the Southfield, Michigan-based company financed risky auto loans that it knew or should have known consumers could not afford, and sold expensive add-on products that consumers did not know they were buying, Ellison said.

The reforms include requirements that Credit Acceptance tell borrowers in advance that their loans carry a historically high risk of default and waive 95% of the amount owed if those borrowers default within the first 12 or 18 months, Ellison said.

Credit Acceptance did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ellison said the settlement included a bipartisan coalition of 41 state attorneys general.

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.