3M stock soars following $7.35 billion 'forever chemicals' settlement

By Reuters News

By Jonathan Stempel, Anshuman Tripathy and Vallari Srivastava

- Shares of 3M MMM.N hit an 8-1/2-year high on Wednesday after the industrial products company agreed to pay $7.35 billion to settle litigation by people who said its "forever chemicals" injured them, and 3M officials predicted enough claimants would join for the settlement to take effect.

Payouts would cover personal injury claims related to firefighting foam made by 3M and be distributed over nine years to as many as 120,000 people, the St. Paul, Minnesota-based company said on Wednesday. It announced the settlement on Tuesday after US markets closed.

The litigation centers on PFAS, short for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, in products manufactured by 3M.

"Forever chemicals" do not break down easily in the human body or environment, and have been linked to health issues including higher cholesterol, low birth weight and kidney and testicular cancer.

The company did not admit liability, and plans a $5.8 billion pre-tax fourth-quarter charge that represents the present value of future payments.

UBS analyst Amit Mehrotra wrote that investors had expected an approximately $10 billion settlement, and the accord removes a "meaningful overhang" on 3M's shares.

At its peak, 3M stock rose 10% on Wednesday to its highest since March 2018, when it traded above $200. In afternoon trading, the shares were up 9.8% at $194.37.

The settlement addresses about 99% of personal injury claims inside and outside the "aqueous film-forming foam" multi-district litigation in the federal court in Charleston, South Carolina.

JUDGE URGES 'SIGNIFICANT TIME AND EFFORT'

Kevin Rhodes, 3M's chief legal affairs officer, said on a conference call on Wednesday that the settlement is designed to address current and future PFAS claims, and 3M will pay most of the money between 2028 and 2033.

Rhodes said 3M can walk away if not enough claimants accept the settlement, "although we do not expect that to happen."

US District Judge Richard Gergel on Wednesday stayed personal injury proceedings against 3M in the litigation, saying the company and claimants should devote "significant time and effort" to implementing the settlement.

In a joint statement, plaintiffs' lawyers David Hoyle and Fred Thompson said the settlement benefits thousands of people who "sought answers and accountability" for nearly a decade.

Foam has often been used to put out high-intensity fires, including on military bases and at airports.

PFAS in firefighters' protective gear has also included 3M's Scotchlite reflective material.

The company said it stopped manufacturing PFAS in 2025.

Tuesday's settlement followed 3M's $10.3 billion accord in 2023 with US cities and towns that claimed its PFAS contaminated drinking water, and 3M's similar $400 million to $450 million settlement in 2025 with New Jersey.

Many other companies including DuPont DD.N and its spinoffs Corteva CTVA.N and Chemours CC.N also face PFAS litigation.

Capital.com is an execution-only brokerage platform and the content provided on the Capital.com website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance.

To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Capital.com (or any affiliate or employee) have any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information provided. Any person acting on the information does so entirely at their own risk.

Any information which could be construed as “investment research” has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.