Scan to Download ios&Android APP

Big tech companies fall: Historical data suggests Nasdaq could bottom under 9000


Updated

Share this article

Have a confidential tip for our reporters?

Nasdaq sign in Times Square NYC
Past bear markets suggest further Nasdaq declines could be ahead - Photo: Shutterstock

Based on historical data from 1995 through to the present, the Nasdaq Composite Index (US 100) has not yet bottomed out and as the markets experience a fundamental reset in interest rates and a potential recession, the tech-focused index could see up to 19% further decline to under 9,000 by the end of the year, DataTrek Research estimates in a note issued to clients on Thursday.

Analysing Nasdaq returns dating to before the 2000-2002 dot com bubble burst, the index has only truly begun rebounding after surpassing a two standard deviation decline from peak levels within the past year. This has only occurred twice since 1995 – the dot com bubble bursting and the financial crisis of 2008 through 2009.

“A two standard deviation annual loss for the Nasdaq, if it occurs in the next [five] months, takes us right back to where [Nasdaq] traded just before the pandemic,” said DataTrek Research co-founder Nick Colas in the note. “All the growth Tech enjoyed over the last 2 years would be fully offset by higher interest rates and economic uncertainty.”

Nasdaq 100 Composite Index (US 100) price chart

Nasdaq at tipping point

Based on the Nasdaq’s 14.5% average return over any given one-year period, a two standard deviation decline is 36.2% from peak levels, the worst-case bottom would be 8,960, or a further 19% decline. The Nasdaq closed Wednesday at 11,048, moving 109 points higher in mid-day trading Thursday.

Currently, the one-year return for the Nasdaq is roughly negative 22%, based on the 23 June 2021 14,253 level, at the mid-point between a one and two standard deviation decline. Assuming the historical fact that bear markets bottom out in the fourth quarter, the Nasdaq is currently at the tipping point for potential further declines.

Unknown variables, DataTrek notes, include the high point for interest rates – driven by Federal Reserve monetary policy – and how much the tech composite companies “over-earned” over the past two years, as tech spending increased during the Covid-19 pandemic on government stimulus and low rates.

With the scope of a potential recession not fully known at this point, the large index component companies in the Nasdaq are particularly susceptible to lower consumer demand. For example, Apple (AAPL) and Tesla (TSLA) sell relatively high-priced consumer durable products, while software companies such as Microsoft (MSFT) are particularly sensitive to business spending.

 

Read more about inflation

Nasdaq Composite Index 1995 - 2022Nasdaq Composite Index 1995 - 2022 - Photo: DataTrek Research

Catalysts for rebound

Somewhat mitigating factors exist, however, considering all of the aforementioned companies are both globally competitive and extremely profitable. Additionally, as access to broadband internet expands into emerging markets, not even a global recession would dampen technology demand over the next three to five years.

What is your sentiment on US100?

11771.5
Bullish
or
Bearish
Vote to see Traders sentiment!

Using these two bear market periods, DataTrek notes the rebounds have come only after a change in either monetary policy or geopolitical conditions. For example, the trigger event for the Nasdaq bouncing back after the dot com bubble burst came after the US Congress authorized military action in Iraq in October 2002 and the 2008 through 2009 financial crisis only turned around after then US President Barack Obama signed a fiscal stimulus package in February 2009.  

 

Interestingly, should the Nasdaq reach the 36% two standard deviation by mid-November, the Nasdaq Composite Index would be in a range between 8,960 and 10,240 – the 9,600 mid-point of which would be close to the 9,817 pre-pandemic Nasdaq high level from 19 February 2020, DataTrek notes.

“There is an odd symmetry in that, we will admit,” Colas notes. “Still, that’s how the math works.”

Read more

The difference between trading assets and CFDs
The main difference between CFD trading and trading assets, such as commodities and stocks, is that you don’t own the underlying asset when you trade on a CFD.
You can still benefit if the market moves in your favour, or make a loss if it moves against you. However, with traditional trading you enter a contract to exchange the legal ownership of the individual shares or the commodities for money, and you own this until you sell it again.
CFDs are leveraged products, which means that you only need to deposit a percentage of the full value of the CFD trade in order to open a position. But with traditional trading, you buy the assets for the full amount. In the UK, there is no stamp duty on CFD trading, but there is when you buy stocks, for example.
CFDs attract overnight costs to hold the trades (unless you use 1-1 leverage), which makes them more suited to short-term trading opportunities. Stocks and commodities are more normally bought and held for longer. You might also pay a broker commission or fees when buying and selling assets direct and you’d need somewhere to store them safely.
Capital Com is an execution-only service provider. The material provided on this website is for information purposes only and should not be understood as an investment advice. Any opinion that may be provided on this page does not constitute a recommendation by Capital Com or its agents. We do not make any representations or warranty on the accuracy or completeness of the information that is provided on this page. If you rely on the information on this page then you do so entirely on your own risk.

Still looking for a broker you can trust?


Join the 400.000+ traders worldwide that chose to trade with Capital.com

1. Create & verify your account

2. Make your first deposit

3. You’re all set. Start trading